skype PRIVACY called into question!!


Reporters Without Borders, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and 43 other campaign groups have signed a letter asking the firm to reveal details about what information is stored and government efforts to access it.

Google, Twitter and others already provide such transparency reports.

Microsoft is to consider the request.

“We are reviewing the letter,” a spokeswoman said. “Microsoft has an ongoing commitment to collaborate with advocates, industry partners and 2,112 governments worldwide to develop solutions and promote effective public policies that help protect people’s online safety and privacy.”

Report request

More than 600 million people use Skype to make voice and video calls and send text and audio messages. Microsoft is currently in the process of migrating users from its Windows Live Messenger product to the service.

The US firm took control of Skype in 2011. Since then, the letter alleges, it has issued “persistently unclear and confusing” details about how confidential conversations on the service were.

Among the details the campaign groups want Microsoft to provide are:

  • Details of how many requests for data each country’s government has made and the percentage that the firm complies with.
  • Information about exactly what information Microsoft keeps itself
  • The firm’s own analysis about the current ability of third-parties to intercept conversations.
  • The policy its staff has for dealing with disclosure requests.
  • Privacy policiesSkype last commented in detail about privacy issues in a blog post last July.

    It said that Skype-to-Skype calls between two participants did not flow through its data centres meaning it would not have access to the video or audio.

    It also noted that calls made between two devices using its software would be encrypted – limiting the ability of anyone to make sense of the data even if they could listen in.

    However, Microsoft acknowledged that group calls using more than two computers did pass through its servers which were used to “aggregate the media streams”, and that text-based messages were also stored on its computers for up to 30 days in order to make sure they were synchronised across users’ various devices.

    Skype group call graphic Microsoft acknowledges that group calls do pass through its servers

    “If a law enforcement entity follows the appropriate procedures and we are asked to access messages stored temporarily on our servers, we will do so,” it added.

    Microsoft also noted that calls which linked Skype to mobile or landline telephone networks would flow through the relevant networks’ equipment, potentially offering an opportunity to tap in.

    Furthermore it recognised that a China-only version of its service involved certain chats being stored and uploaded to the local authorities in compliance with the country’s laws. Surveillance efforts

  • Beyond China, several governments have signalled they want to have access to Skype data.

    The UK’s draft Communications Data Bill suggests internet service providers retain information about their subscribers’ use of Skype and other internet communications tools.

    The Cnet news site reported last year that the FBI had drafted an amendment to US law which would require Microsoft and other net chat tool providers to create surveillance backdoors in their products.

    More recently the blog published what it said was a leaked document from Germany’s government stating that its Federal Criminal Police Office was working on surveillance software to allow it to track Skype and other data communications. It said the agency hoped to have it ready by 2014.

    An expenditure report by the country’s Ministry of Home Affairs suggests the local authorities have already spent money to try to monitor Skype using third-party software.


Software Patents! What is the reality?? Who invented this?


The man who was awarded the first software patent says that he thinks the field is now “a big mess” – but that he “hopes it will get straightened out in time”.

Martin Goetz, 83, was awarded the first patent on a piece of software in April 1968, for a method of sorting data. As US Patent No.3,380,029 it marked a watershed that would eventually lead to the rise of Microsoft, and then to the “smartphone patent wars” that have been fought out between Apple, Samsung, Motorola, Microsoft, HTC and Google.

But he thinks that Amazon’s patent on its “1-Click” product is absurd, and that Apple’s on the “pinch and zoom” for pictures is questionable.

Computerworld – then a newspaper – greeted the news of his patent award in 1968 with the front-page headline “First Patent Is Issued For Software, Full Implications Are Not Yet Known”.

Goetz was working for a company called Applied Data Research, in an era when mainframes were the only computers around. As he explains in a short film about inventors, made by David Friedman for PBS Digital Studios, IBM – the dominant force in computing – was making profits on the hardware but giving the software that went with them away for free.

“Back in the 1960s, IBM and other computer companies were giving away their software when they sold their computer. We were trying to sell out software, but selling against free software is very difficult. That’s the reason I tried to get a patent.

“IBM had a sorting system they were giving away free and I didn’t want them to copy that method and also distribute it by giving it away for free.”

Goetz couldn’t have applied copyright law, because that wouldn’t have protected the specific method he had invented – only the code he had written to achieve the sorting. But in 1964 he had been to a conference on software intellectual property issues, which persuaded him that a patent could be awarded for a piece of software. The key element for a patent is that it should have an “inventive step” compared to existing methods for carrying something out. But all previous patents had been for physical products – not for an abstract system of doing things to a generalised machine.

“So I applied for a patent. And fortunately I did get a patent.” Filed on 8 April 1965, the patent was granted on 28 April 1968.

Since then software patents have become enormously valuable – used by companies (including IBM) to squeeze rivals. Earlier this week it was revealed that Apple’s Steve Jobs threatened to start a patent war against Palm unless it agreed to a deal whereby it wouldn’t try to hire staff away from his company. Palm’s chief executive, Ed Colligan, rebuffed Jobs and pointed out that the idea was illegal.

More recently Apple was awarded $1.05bn in damages by a US jury over infringements by Samsung on a number of patents relating to smartphones and tablets.

Goetz though is unrepentant, and has been an advocate of software patents.

He also says that with his help, ADR helped to create the independent software industry by going to the US Department of Justice, which at the time was looking at antitrust action against IBM. “I and several others who were selling programs against free software [from computer makers] thought it was unlawful. ADR pushed for IBM to unbundle their software; that was the start of the software industry. It was also the start of people and companies applying for patents for their software inventions.

But he acknowledges that the whole field has become “very controversial”. He thinks that Amazon’s One-Click patent – valid in the US but repeatedly turned down in the European Union – “should never have been awarded”, and that Apple’s pinch-and-zoom patent for enlarging or shrinking content displayed on its iOS devices is “questionable” on the basis that it might be thought “obvious”.

“It’s a little bit of a mess,” Goetz says, with grand understatement. “Hopefully it will get straightened out over time.”